Jason Valendy Jason Valendy

#UMC Delegates and Olympic Athletes

There is a level of health that is required to be an athlete at the Olympics. Events are different and each event requires, at times, a different skill set. While weight lifters and swimmers both qualify for the Olympics, you don't assign the weight lifter to swim the 100 backstroke or ask the swimmer to lift weights over her head. It is obvious. While one qualifies to the Olympics, each skill set for the events are different. 

The UMC meets every four years, and much like the Olympics, there are many people who qualify to attend. It is worth asking, what are the skill sets that may be needed for an individual attending the General Conference?

Depending upon your specific role at the GC, you may need a different set of skills. Bishops need to be good at facilitation. Various observers need to be good researchers. Delegates need to be thoughtful. And, similar to the Olympics, there are things that are universal to all participants. In the Olympics, physical fitness may be a universal skill to be an Olympic athlete. In the GC, spiritual fitness seems to be a universal skill. 

If you are ever in a position to vote for delegates to the GC, I would submit that the primary requirement be one of spiritual fitness. Asking questions like: Is this person patient? Is this person kind? Is this person self aware and can they self reflect? Can this person self differentiate between issues and personal attacks and not see them as one in the same? Can this person keep their 'snark' in check? Can this person listen with their heart?

Just like the physically fit are most successful at the Olympics likewise, the people who are the most helpful and insightful at this GC are people who are spiritually fit. 

Read More
Jason Valendy Jason Valendy

Why Great Preaching Does Not Impact the Work of #UMCGC

So far there has been excellent preaching at General Conference. I am not saying this as one might say to the preacher as they leave the sanctuary to get to lunch. There really has been great preaching here. Powerful words, images, stories and metaphors. Prophetic calls to actions and even pricking the hearts of the most dug in hearts. Even the great fire of preaching is not taking the chill off the cold spirit of compassion at GC.

Then I was reminded of this infamous study made popular by Malcolm Gladwell:

A study at Princeton Theological Seminary asked seminarians to prepare a short, extemporaneous talk on a given biblical theme, and then walk over to a nearby building to present it.

Along the way to the presentation, each student ran into a man slumped in an alley, head down, eyes closed, coughing and groaning. The question was, “who would stop and help?”

The researchers included three variables: (1) the background of the subject - whether they had entered seminary as a way of helping people or not, (2) which parable they were to prepare - several were given the Good Samaritan parable as their subject, and (3) a time context, saying either that they were running several minutes late and should hurry up, or that they were early and had some time to spare. The results were interesting.

The first two variables had no effect. Whether somebody had devoted their life in service to their fellow man, or even whether they had just been reminded of the value of altruism by preparing a speech on the Good Samaritan, had no effect on whether they stopped and helped. "The only thing that really mattered was whether the student was in a rush. Of the group that was rushed, 10% stopped to help. Of the group who knew they had a few minutes to spare, 63% stopped." In other words, all of one's attitudes and feelings are over-ridden by subtle clues in the environment, they were rushed and in a hurry.

With all the talk about the merits of the rules, we have less time. We are rushed. And we know what happens to our ability to show compassion to others when we are rushed.

Great preaching does not impact the work of GC because we rush ourselves. Or in the words of Shigera Miyamoto, "A delayed games is eventually good, but a rushed game is forever bad."

Read More